🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.